|  ISSN: 2687-5314
Anadolu Türk Eğitim Dergisi

Orjinal Araştırma Makalesi | Anadolu Türk Eğitim Dergisi 2023, Cil. 5(2) 229-250

The Relationship Between School Principals' Leadership Styles and the School's Synergetic Climate and Organizational Attractiveness

Muaz Çağırman & Servet Atik

ss. 229 - 250   |  Makale No: MANU-2312-02-0004.R3

Yayın tarihi: Aralık 31, 2023  |   Okunma Sayısı: 37  |  İndirilme Sayısı: 65

PDF İndir

Özet

In order to keep the organization alive according to its goals and to ensure its continuity, there is a need for managers with leadership qualities who use the available human and material resources as efficiently as possible. One of the factors that ensure the continuity of the organization and its strong ties is the synergetic climate in the organization. One of the important organizational factors affecting individuals' performance in their jobs is organizational attractiveness. This study aims to examine the relationship between school principals' leadership styles (transformational leadership, autocratic leadership, supportive leadership) and schools' synergetic climates and organizational attractiveness. The sample of the research consists of teachers working in the central districts of Battalgazi and Yeşilyurt in Malatya province. Leadership Styles Scale, Synergetic Climate Scale and Organizational Attractiveness Scale were used as data collection tools in the research. By analyzing the model created within the scope of this research using structural equation modeling, two of the seven hypotheses presented for the research were rejected and five hypotheses were accepted. It was revealed that transformational leadership, autocratic leadership, supportive leadership and synergetic climate variables directly or indirectly affect organizational attractiveness. In addition, leadership styles and synergetic climate endogenous variables together explain approximately 57% of the variance in the organizational attractiveness exogenous variable.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Leadership styles, school principal, synergetic climate, organizational attractiveness, teacher.

Bu makaleye nasıl atıf yapılır?

APA 6th edition
Cagirman, M. & Atik, S. (2023). The Relationship Between School Principals' Leadership Styles and the School's Synergetic Climate and Organizational Attractiveness . Anadolu Türk Eğitim Dergisi, 5(2), 229-250.

Harvard
Cagirman, M. and Atik, S. (2023). The Relationship Between School Principals' Leadership Styles and the School's Synergetic Climate and Organizational Attractiveness . Anadolu Türk Eğitim Dergisi, 5(2), pp. 229-250.

Chicago 16th edition
Cagirman, Muaz and Servet Atik (2023). "The Relationship Between School Principals' Leadership Styles and the School's Synergetic Climate and Organizational Attractiveness ". Anadolu Türk Eğitim Dergisi 5 (2):229-250.

Kaynakça
  1. Akçakoca, A. and Bilgin, K. U. (2016). The principals’ leadership styles and teachers’ performance. The Journal of Contemporary Administrative Sciences, 3(2), 1-23. [Google Scholar]
  2. Akman,Y. and Özdemir, M. (2018). Development of organisational attractiveness scale: The validity and reliability study. PamukkaleUniversity Journal of Social Sciences Institute,33, 371-380. [Google Scholar]
  3. Akpolat, T. and Levent, F. (2018). Developing of organizational synergy scale for teachers. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 14(2), 728-744. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ali, A. K. (2021). Contribution of the principal’s transformational leadership and school climate on teacher performance through work motivation. Journal of K6 Education and Management, 4(1), 81-90. [Google Scholar]
  5. Arslan, E. (2020). The role of motivation factors on the relationship between employer brand and organizational attractiveness: The case of Google (Unpublished Master's Thesis). EgeUniversity. [Google Scholar]
  6. Aslan, H., & Karip, E. (2014). Developing the leadership standards of school principals.Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 20(3), 255-279. [Google Scholar]
  7. Atalay, D., Akçıl, U., & Özkul, A.E. (2019). Effects of transformational and instructional leadership on organizational silence and attractiveness and their importance for the sustainability of educational institutions. Sustainability MDPI, 11 (5618). [Google Scholar]
  8. Atik, S., Erdoğan, U. &Çağırman, M. (2023). Examining the relationship between the synergetic climate and the organizational attractiveness of schools, E-International Journal of Educational Research, 14 (4), 17-32. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ayık, A. andŞayir, G. (2014). The relation between instructional leadership behaviours of school principals and organizational climate. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 13(49), 253-279. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ayyıldız, H. and Cengiz, E. (2006). A conceptual investigation of structural equation models (SEM) on testing marketing models. Suleyman Demirel University Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 11(1), 63-84. [Google Scholar]
  11. Baş, T.,Amarat, M., Ünal, Ö., Durmuş, A. & Boz, Ş. (2018). The effects of organizational climate on organizational commitment: The case of a private hospital.Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty, 5 (3), 538-548. [Google Scholar]
  12. Bayram, N. (2010). Yapısaleşitlikmodellemesinegiriş: AMOS uygulamaları [Introduction to structural equation modeling: AMOS applications]. Ezgi Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  13. Bogler, R. (2001). The influence of leadership style on teacher job satisfaction. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(5), 662-683. [Google Scholar]
  14. Cherry, K. (2006). Leadership styles. Retrieved from academia.edu.tr. [Google Scholar]
  15. Chukwusa, J. (2018). Autocratic leadership style: Obstacle to success in academic libraries. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  16. Clinebell, S., Skudiene, V., Trijonyte, R., & Reardon, J.F. (2013). Impact of leadership styles on employee organizational commitment. Journal of Service Science, 6, 139-152. [Google Scholar]
  17. Çankaya, İ. &Aküzüm, C. (2010). The relationship between teachers’ communication competence and managers’ supportive leadership roles in primary schools. Journal of Dicle University Ziya Gökalp Faculty of Education, (14), 49-57. [Google Scholar]
  18. Çekmecelioğlu, H. G. (2006). Evaluating the relationships between organizational climate, emotional commitment and creativity: A research. Trends in Business and Economics, 20(2), 295-310. [Google Scholar]
  19. Çelik, H. E. and Yılmaz, V. (2013). Lisrel 9.1 ileyapısaleşitlikmodellemesi: Temel kavramlar-uygulamalar-programlama [Structural equation modeling with Lisrel 9.1: Basic concepts-applications-programming](2nd ed.). Ankara: Anı Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  20. Çetin, N. G., &Beceren, E. (2007). Leading personality: Gandhi. Journal of Suleyman Demirel University Institute of Social Sciences, 5, 111-132. [Google Scholar]
  21. Çiftçi, Y. (2002). The relationship between leadership skills and leadership styles of primary school administrators (Unpublished Master's Thesis). PamukkaleUniversity. [Google Scholar]
  22. Çokuluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G. andBüyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyalbilimleriçinçokdeğişkenliistatistik [Multivariate statistics for social sciences]. Ankara: PegemAcademy. [Google Scholar]
  23. Dural,S., Aslan, G.,Alinçe,  M.  and Araza, A.  (2014).  Organizational attractiveness: A scale adaptation study. Doğuş University Journal,15(2), 141-154. [Google Scholar]
  24. Erkuş, A. &Günlü, E. (2008). The effects of emotional intelligence on transformational leadership.The Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Business Journal, 9 (2), 187-209. [Google Scholar]
  25. Ferreira Barbosa DB, da Silva Guedes LC, Abi Rached CD, Alves Teixeira CA, dos Santos LV and de Souza Almeida T. (2021). Leadership styles of hospital nurses: Impacts on the work process and organizational climate. Trends in Nursing and Health Care Research, 1(3), 1-8. [Google Scholar]
  26. Gök, E. E. (2007). Organizational citizenship behaviour in terms of organizational culture. (Unpublished Master's Thesis). PamukkaleUniversity. [Google Scholar]
  27. Gültekin, C. (2012). The effect of school administrators' leadership styles on school climate: The case of Anatolian side of Istanbul province. (Unpublished Master's Thesis). MaltepeUniversity. [Google Scholar]
  28. Gürbüz, S. (2021). AMOS ileyapısaleşitlikmodellemesi [Structural equation modeling with AMOS] (2nd ed.). Ankara: Seçkin Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  29. Gürkan, G., Ç. (2006). Organizational commitment: Organizational climate's effect on organizational commitment and research of the relationship between organizational climate and organizational commitment in Trakya University. (Unpublished Master's Thesis). TrakyaUniversity. [Google Scholar]
  30. Hogan, R., & Kaiser, R. B. (2005). What we know about leadership. Review of General Psychology, 9(2), 169-180. [Google Scholar]
  31. Karakoyunlu, F. B. (2014). Effects of leadership behaviour on employees' job satisfaction and organizational commitment. (Unpublished Master's Thesis).BeykentUniversity. [Google Scholar]
  32. Karcıoğlu, F. (2001). The relationship between organizational culture and organizational climate. Trends in Business and Economics, 15(1-2), 265-283. [Google Scholar]
  33. Kaya, A. (2014). Development of synergistic climate scale the reliability and validity of Turkish and Slovakian forms. Educational Research and Reviews, 9(20), 938-953. doi: 10.5897/ERR2014.1818. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  34. Kaya, M. (2020). Impact on organizational commitment of democratic and authoritarian leadership style. (Unpublished Master's Thesis). KarabükUniversity. [Google Scholar]
  35. Keskes, I. (2014). Relationship between leadership styles and dimensions of employee organizational commitment: A critical review and discussion of future directions. Intangible Capital, 10(1), 26-51. [Google Scholar]
  36. Khattak, S.R., Batool, S., & Haider, M. (2017). Relationship of leadership styles and employee creativity: A mediating role of creative self-efficacy and moderating role of organizational climate. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 11(2), 698-719. [Google Scholar]
  37. Kılıç, Y. and Yılmaz, E. (2018). Development of the leadership style scale of school administrators. Journal of Social and Humanities Sciences Research, 5(27), 3006-3016. [Google Scholar]
  38. Korkmaz, M. (2007). The impact of leadership styles on organizational health. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 13(49), 57–91. [Google Scholar]
  39. Köse, A. (2016). The impact of demographic features on teachers’ work engagement. Turkish Journal of Education, 5(4), 255-264. [Google Scholar]
  40. Küçük, M. (2008). The effect of leadership behaviors of management in educational institutions to the organizational climate and to the instructors’ performance. (Unpublished Master's Thesis). BeykentUniversity. [Google Scholar]
  41. Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D.L. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership & Management, 28, 27- 42. [Google Scholar]
  42. Manik, E. (2016). The influence of transformational leadership on achievement motivation and organizational climate and employee performance. The International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 6, 599-608. [Google Scholar]
  43. Mumcu, A. (2018). The mediating role of the impression management and leader-member exchange on the effect of organizational climate on organizational cynicism. (Unpublished Master's Thesis). GaziosmanpaşaUniversity. [Google Scholar]
  44. Onay, F. N. (2020). The effects of managerial discretion and workplace incivility on task performance: The mediating role of organizational attractiveness. (Unpublished Master's Thesis). Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University. [Google Scholar]
  45. Özüçağlıyan, H., N. (2015). The effect of job enrichment on organizational attractiveness. (Unpublished Master's Thesis). MaltepeUniversity. [Google Scholar]
  46. Rowold, J., & Schlotz, W. (2009). Transformational and transactional leadership and followers’ chronic stress. Leadership Review, 9(1), 35-48. [Google Scholar]
  47. Sever, N., & Atik, S. (2021). Examining the relationship between the leadership styles of school principals and the organizational attractiveness of schools. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education (INUJFE), 22(1). [Google Scholar]
  48. Si, S., & Wei, F. (2012). Transformational and transactional leaderships, empowerment climate, and innovation performance: A multilevel analysis in the Chinese context. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21(2), 299-320. [Google Scholar]
  49. Sriyani, G. W. (2005). Employee morale and leadership styles: A study on the most attractive leadership style in the Sri Lankan banking sector. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Sri Lanka Studies, University of Kelaniya, pp 124 [Google Scholar]
  50. Şama, E., &Kolamaz, C. (2011). The relationship between supportive and developmental leadership characteristics and organizational commitment. The Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 9(2), 313-342. [Google Scholar]
  51. Şen, Y. &Yaşlıoğlu, M. (2010). A study to determine the effect of transformational leadership on innovation supportive organizational climate. Istanbul Management Journal, 21(66), 97-117. [Google Scholar]
  52. Şentürk, C.&Sağnak, M. (2012). The relationship between primary school principals' leadership behaviors and school climate. The Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 10 (1), 29-43. [Google Scholar]
  53. Tengilimoğlu, D. (2005). A field study to determine the characteristics of leadership behavior in public and private sector organizations. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 14(14), 1-16. [Google Scholar]
  54. Töremen, F. (2001). A kind of creativity in school management: Synergy. Fırat University Journal of Social Sciences, 11(1), 201-212. [Google Scholar]
  55. Varli, S. (2015). Comparison of the elemantary school principals' leadership behaviour and school climate: Sakarya province (Unpublished Master's Thesis). Sakarya University. [Google Scholar]
  56. Vugt, M.V., Jepson, S.F., Hart, C.M., & Cremer, D.D. (2004). Autocratic leadership in social dilemmas: A threat to group stability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 1-13. [Google Scholar]
  57. Yalçınkaya, M. (2002). Effective leadership in the contemporary school.EgeJournal of Education, 1(2), 109-119. [Google Scholar]
  58. Yıldız, H. H. (2019). The relationship between ethical climate, organizational trust and organizational commitment of Düzce emergency medical services employees. (Unpublished Master's Thesis). DüzceUniversity. [Google Scholar]
  59. Yılmaz, K. (2010). The opinions of primary school teachers concerning administrators’ leadership behaviors and pupil control ideologies. Education and Science, 32(146), 12-23. [Google Scholar]
  60. Yüceler, A. (2009). The relationship between organizational commitment and organizational climate: A theoretical and practical study. The Journal of Selcuk University Social Sciences Institute, 22, 445-458. [Google Scholar]
İndir
Metric
Geçmiş
Benzer

Cilt 5 Sayı 2

Aralık 2023

Tüm Makaleler

Anadolu Türk Eğitim Dergisi

.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Gizlilik     |     Kullanım Koşulları     |     Çerez Politikaları
Creative Commons Lisansı
© 2012 - 2024 - THDSoft e-Journal Management System.