Derleme Makalesi    |    Açık Erişim
Anadolu Türk Eğitim Dergisi 2025, Clt. 7(2) 310-331

Criteria Used in Curriculum Evaluation

Mehmet Okur, Etem Yeşilyur

ss. 310 - 331

Yayın Tarihi: Aralık 31, 2025  |   Görüntüleme Sayısı: 0/0   |   İndirilme Sayısı: 0/0


Özet

Just as educational curricula are expected to possess certain qualities such as suitability for their purpose in theoretical and practical terms, scientific grounding, cost-effectiveness, functionality, and applicability, certain criteria must also be considered from the perspective of curriculum evaluation. The primary aim of curriculum evaluation in education is to obtain feedback regarding the deficiencies or erroneous aspects of a curriculum that is under development or in use, and to make the necessary revisions in the curriculum based on this feedback. For the evaluation of an educational curriculum, the degree to which the curriculum achieves its objectives must be measured, and the measurement results must be compared with various criteria. The criteria used in evaluation, as well as the priority order of these criteria, may vary depending on variables such as the type and purpose of the curriculum and the instructional level at which it is implemented. In this context, the question “What are the criteria used in the evaluation of an educational curriculum?” comes to the forefront. No study has been found in the literature that addresses as a whole the criteria used in curriculum evaluation and the general characteristics of these criteria. Conducted within the framework of a qualitative research approach through a review of the literature and functioning as a compilation study, the present research aims to identify the criteria used in the evaluation of educational curricula and to explain the general characteristics of these criteria. Within the scope of the study, it was determined that the criteria used in the evaluation of educational curricula include curriculum evaluation approaches, curriculum evaluation models, objectives, competencies, standards, accreditation, learning outcomes, examinations, 21st-century skills, literacy, and development/advancement, and the general characteristics of these criteria were explained. The results obtained are expected to guide stakeholders of the education system, particularly those involved in curriculum development and evaluation studies, and to contribute to the related literature.

Anahtar kelimeler: Educational Curriculum, Curriculum Development, Curriculum Evaluation, Evaluation Criteria


Bu makaleye nasıl atıf yapılır

APA 7th edition
Okur, M., & Yesilyur, E. (2025). Criteria Used in Curriculum Evaluation. Anadolu Türk Eğitim Dergisi, 7(2), 310-331.

Harvard
Okur, M. and Yesilyur, E. (2025). Criteria Used in Curriculum Evaluation. Anadolu Türk Eğitim Dergisi, 7(2), pp. 310-331.

Chicago 16th edition
Okur, Mehmet and Etem Yesilyur (2025). "Criteria Used in Curriculum Evaluation". Anadolu Türk Eğitim Dergisi 7 (2):310-331.

Kaynakça

    Aslan, M., & Çıkar, İ. (2017). Evaluation of 4th grade mathematics curriculum by Tyler’s objective based evaluation model. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(2), 172-196. https://doi.org/10.17522/balikesirnef.373149

    Aşıcı, M. (2009). Literacy as a personal and social value. Journal of Values Education, 7(17), 9-25. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ded/issue/29183/312492

    Ataman, O., & Adıgüzel, A. (2019). Investigation of Turkey and Australia’s teacher education systems and accreditation policies. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 12(2), 678-700. https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.430580

    Ataş, R., Baysal, O., Aykol, N., & Ünver, G. (2021). Analysis of the subjects and reasons of curriculum studies. Western Anatolia Journal of Educational Sciences, 12(1), 177-205. https://doi.org/10.51460/baebd.866149

    AYÇ (2022). Avrupa yeterlilikler çerçevesi [European competences framework]. https://europa.eu/europass/tr/europass-araclari/avrupa-yeterlilikler-cercevesi

    Aydoğdu, Ü. R., Karamustafaoğlu, O., & Bülbül, M. Ş. (2017). The relation between research methods and sample in academic researches: A case of confirmatory document analysis. Dicle University Journal of Ziya Gökalp Education Faculty, (30), 556-565. https://doi.org/10.14582/DUZGEF.1803

    Aygören, F., & Er, K. O. (2018). Classifıcations of curriculum. Turkish Studies Educational Sciences, 13(11), 269-296. http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.13230

    Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

    Çelik, V., & Yeşilyurt, E. (2013). Kalkınmada eğitimin rolü: Sayısal veriler ışığında KOP bölgesi eğitim göstergeleri [The role of education in development: Education indicators in the KOP region in light of numerical data]. KOP Bölgesel Kalkınma Dergisi [KOP Journal of Regional Development], 1(1), 141-152. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344206736

    Çetin, B. (2014). The relati̇on of educati̇on and development: The sample of Turkey [Master’s thesis: Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey University]. Thesis number: 375641. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/

    Çiftçi, S., Sağlam, A., & Yayla, A. (2021). Student, teacher and educational environments in the context of 21. century skills. RumeliDE Journal of Language and Literature Studies, (24), 718-734. https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.995863

    Çilek, E. (2017). Problems about program evaluation in Turkey (Samsun province as sample) [Master’s thesis: Ondokuz Mayıs University]. Thesis number: 471980. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/

    Dağyar, M. (2021). Eğitim programının temel ögesi: Hedef [The basic element of the curriculum: Objective]. E. Yeşilyurt (Ed.), Eğitimde program geliştirme ve değerlendirme [Curriculum development and evaluation in education], (pp. 357- 401). Ankara: Vizetek.

    Dağyar, M. (2022). Orijinal ve yenilenmiş Bloom taksonomileri [Original and a revision of the Bloom’s taxonomy]. E. Yeşilyurt (Ed.), Eğitim taksonomileri [Educational taxonomies], (pp. 31- 52). Ankara: Vizetek.

    Demirel, Ö. (2017). Kuramdan uygulamaya eğitimde program geliştirme [Curriculum development in education: From theory to practice]. Ankara: Pegem.

    Demirtaş, Z. (2017). A general view to program evaluation approaches in education. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 7(4), 756-768. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.388616

    Doğan, E. (2022). Analysis of approaches to curriculum evaluation in Turkey [PhD thesis: Gaziantep University]. Thesis number: 738890. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/

    Doll, R. C. (1996). Curriculum improvement: Decision making and process. Boston: Allyn Bacon.

    Donmuş Kaya, V. (2022). Simpson’ın psikomotor alan taksonomisi [Simpson's psychomotor domain taxonomy]. E. Yeşilyurt (Ed.), Eğitim taksonomileri [Educational taxonomies], (pp. 275-295). Ankara: Vizetek.

    Elaldı, Ş. (2022). Krathwohl ve arkadaşlarının duyuşsal alan taksonomisi [Krathwohl and colleagues' affective domain taxonomy]. E. Yeşilyurt (Ed.), Eğitim taksonomileri [Educational taxonomies], (pp. 247-274). Ankara: Vizetek.

    EPDAD (2016). Öğretmen eğitiminde program değerlendirme ve akreditasyon el kitabı [Curriculum Evaluation and Accreditation Handbook in Teacher Education]. https://epdad.org.tr

    Erdamar, F. S. (2020). The analysis of primary school teachers' curriculum literacy perceptions and primary school administrators' perceptions of teachers' curriculum literacy skills in the context of progressive philosophy [PhD thesis: Fırat University]. Thesis number: 621287. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/

    Erden, M. (1998). Eğitimde program değerlendirme [Curriculum evaluation in education]. Ankara: Anı.

    ERG (2005). Yeni öğretim programlarını inceleme ve değerlendirme raporu [Report on the review and evaluation of new curriculums]. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ilkonline/issue/8607/107225

    Ertürk, S. (2014). Eğitimde program geliştirme [Curriculum development in education]. İstanbul: Edge.

    Eviren, Ö. S. (2017). Training evaluation models. The Journal of Limitless Education and Research, 2(3), 57-76. https://doi.org/10.29250/sead.343245

    Fink, A. (1995). How to design surveys. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication,

    Fitzpatrick J. L., Sanders J. R., & Worthen, B. R. (2011). Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines. Pearson Education.

    Gelen, İ., & Alış, E. (2018). Opinions of stakeholders about evaluation of middle-school mathematics and science curriculum dimensions. Journal of Interdisciplinary Educational Research, 2(4), 28-42. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jier/issue/42063/482147

    Gökmenoğlu, T. (2014). The wide angle: Program evaluation studies in Turkey in terms of models and approaches. International Journal of Curriculum and Instructional Studies, 4(7), 55-70. https://ijocis.epo-der.org/arsiv-archive/

    Güllü, M., Arslan, C., Uğraş, S., & Görgüt, İ., (2011). The evaluation of the new secondary school physical education time table convenience. Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Journal of Education Facult, 8(Special Issue), 122-133. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/yyuefd/issue/13708/165970

    Güner, H., Çelebi, N., Taşçı, G., & Korumaz, M. (2014). Analysis of international tests (PISA, TIMSS and PIRLS) in the context of neoliberal education policies and equality of opportunity in education. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 3(3), 33-75. https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v3i3.329

    Günkör, C. (2017). Exploration of the relationship between educationand development. Journal of International Social Sciences Education, 3(1) , 14-32. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/issej/issue/32023/341447

    Herdman, E. A. (2006). Guidelines for conducting a literature review and presenting conference papers. Journal of Education and Research in Nursing, 3(1), 2-4. https://jer-nursing.org/jvi.aspx?un=JERN-25348&volume=3&issue=1

    Karademir, T., Öztürk, H. T., & Alper, A. (2014). An international review of objects of ınformational technology and software course. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311102665

    Karagülle, S., Varkı, E., & Hekimoğlu, E. (2019). An investigation of the concept of program literacy in the context of apllicability and functionality of educational program. Journal of Educational Reflections, 3(2), 85-97. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/eduref/issue/50553/535626

    Karahan, M. (2018). Evaluation of the development level and development measures of the country results of the PISA exam. Atlas Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi [Atlas Journal of Social Sciences], 2(3), 291-310. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/atlas/issue/55582/760710

    Kaya, Z. (2002). Uzaktan eğitim [Distance education]. Ankara: Pegem.

    Kılıç, A. (2022). An evaluation of Turkish higher educatıon qualificatıons framework graduate level definitions within the 21st century skills classification of P21. Journal of New Approaches in Education, 5(2), 66-83. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/eyyad/issue/74212/1153145

    Koltay, T. (2011) The media and the literacies: media literacy, ınformation literacy, digital literacy. Media, Culture & Society, (33), 211-221. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443710393382

    Kotluk, N., & Yayla, A. (2016). An evaluation of hıgh school 9th grade physics curriculum accordıng to Tyler's objective based evaluation model. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University Journal of Faculty of Education, 16(4), 1832-1852. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/aibuefd/issue/28550/304599

    Kurt, A. (2016). The evaluation of 4th grade english language curriculum by context, input, process, product model [Master’s thesis: Akdeniz University]. Thesis number: 436743. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/

    Kurt, A. (2021). Eğitimde program değerlendirme: Yaklaşımlar ve modeller [Curriculum evaluation in education: Approaches and models]. E. Yeşilyurt (Ed.), Eğitimde program geliştirme ve değerlendirme [Curriculum development and evaluation in education], (pp. 519–578). Ankara: Vizetek.

    Kuyubaşıoğlu, R. M. (2019). Investigation of teacher's education program literacy qualifications [Master’s thesis: Mersin University]. Thesis number: 608523. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/

    Kürüm Yapıcıoğlu, D., Atik Kara, D., & Sever, D. (2016). Trends and problems in curriculum evaluation studies in Turkey: The perspective of domain experts. International Journal of Curriculum and Instructional Studies, 6(12), 91 - 113. https://ijocis.epo-der.org/arsiv-archive/

    McCain, D. V. (2005). Evaluation basics. Alexandria: American Society for Training & Development.

    MEB (2019). PISA 2018 Türkiye ön raporu [PISA 2018 Turkey pre-report]. http://pisa.meb.gov.tr

    MEB (2021). PIRLS 2021. https://pirls.meb.gov.tr

    MEB (2022). TIMMS nedir? [What is TIMSS?].https://timss.meb.gov.tr

    METK (2014). Milli Eğitim Temel Kanunu [National Education Fundamental Law]. https://oygm.meb.gov.tr

    Morrison, G.S. (1993). Contemporary curriculum K-8. Boston Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon.

    Oral, B., & Yazar, T. (2020). Eğitimde program geliştirme ve değerlendirme [Curriculum development and evaluation in education]. Ankara: Pegem.

    Ornstein, C. A., & Hunkins, P. F. (2018). Curriculum: foundations, principles, and Issues. Harlow: Pearson.

    Özçelik, D. A. (2009). Eğitim programları ve öğretim: Genel öğretim yöntemi [Curriculum and instruction: General teaching method]. Ankara: Pegem.

    Özdemir, O. (2019). Dijital okuryazarlık [Digital literacy]. E. Kolaç & S. Dal (Ed.), Etkinliklerle Türkçe öğretimi [Turkish language teaching through activities] (pp. 587-604). Ankara: Nobel.

    Özdemir, S. M. (2009). Curriculum evaluation ın education and examination of the curriculum evaluation studies ın Turkey.Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Journal of Education Faculty, 6(2), 126-149. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/yyuefd/issue/13712/166017

    Özgeriş, M., & Özer, S. (2022). Evaluation of program outcomes in the accreditation process: A research on the case of Ataturk University landscape architecture. Turkish Journal of Forest Science, 6(2), 496-509. https://doi.org/10.32328/turkjforsci.1147438

    Özgül, İ. (2021). Examination of the music course teaching program in terms of the European qualifications framework and the Turkish qualifications framework. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 18(43), 6806-6838. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.962013

    Özkan, U. B. (2019). Eğitim bilimleri araştırmaları için doküman inceleme yöntemi [Document review method for educational science research]. Ankara: Pegem.

    Polat, Ü., & Yeşilyurt, E. (2021). Eğitim programının temel ögesi: Sınama durumu [The basic element of the training program: Testing situation]. E. Yeşilyurt (Ed.), Eğitimde program geliştirme ve değerlendirme [Curriculum development and evaluation in education], (pp: 467-486). Ankara: Vizetek.

    Richardson, V. (1994). Standards and assessments: What is their educative potential? M. Diez, V. Richardson ve P. Pierson (Ed.), Setting standards and educating teachers içinde (ss. 15-36). American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.

    Sağlam, M., & Yüksel, İ. (2007). Meta-analysis and meta-evaluation methods in program evaluation. Dumlupınar Universıty Journal of Social Sciences, (18), 175-188. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/dpusbe/issue/4760/65397

    Sever, D. (2021). Program geliştirmede değerlendirme [Evaluation in curriculum development]. H. Sucuoğlu & M. Gökdağ Baltaoğlu (Ed.), Eğitimde program geliştirme [Curriculum development in education], (pp.227-254). İstanbul: Lisans.

    Sönmez, V., & Alacapınar, F. G. (2015). Örnekleriyle eğitimde program değerlendirme [Curriculum evaluation with examples]. Ankara: Anı.

    Stake, R. E. (2004). Standards-based & responsive evaluation. London, New Delhi, Sage.

    Tanner, D., & Tanner, L. N. (1980). Curriculum development: Theory into practice. New York: Macmillan.

    Taş, U., & Yenilmez F. (2008). Role of education on developments in Turkey and return on educatİon İnvestment. Journal of Socıal Sciences, Eskişehir Osmangazi Unıversıty, 9(1), 155-186. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ogusbd/issue/10993/131558

    Taş, U. (2007). The Role of education in the process of development through the development plans of Turkey [Master’s thesis: Eskişehir Osmangazi University]. Thesis number: 206409. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/

    Tezel, T. (2010). Factors affecting development in least developed countries and the effects of education on development [Master’s thesis: İstanbul University]. Thesis number: 277891. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/

    Tolunay, A., & Akyol, A. (2006). Development and rural development: Main concepts and definitions. Turkish Journal of Forestry, 7(2), 116-127. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/tjf/issue/20887/224180

    TTKB (2023). 21. yüzyıl becerileri ve değerlere yönelik araştırma raporu [Research report on 21st-century skills and values]. https://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/www/baskanligimizca-21-yuzyil-becerileri-ve-degerlere-yonelik-arastirma-raporu-yayimlandi/icerik/509

    TYÇ (2020). Terimler sözlüğü, yeterlilik [A dictionary of terms, competence]. https://www.tyc.gov.tr/indir/tyc-terimler-sozlugu-i1.html

    TYÇ (2022). Yeterlilik [Competence], https://www.tyc.gov.tr/sayfa/yeterlilik-kavrami

    Uşun, S. (2016). Eğitimde program değerlendirme [Curriculum evaluation in education]. Ankara: Anı.

    Varış, F. (1997). Eğitimde program geliştirme: Teoriler ve teknikler [Curriculum development in education: Theories and techniques]. Ankara: Alkım.

    Wood, B. B. (2001). Stake’s countenance model: evaluation an environmental education professional development course. The Journal of Environmental Education, 32(2), 18-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958960109599134

    Yalçın, S. (2018). 21st century skills and tools and approaches that are used to measure these skills. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 51(1), 183-201. https://doi.org/10.30964/auebfd.405860

    Yazçayır, N. (2016). The development of DACEM curriculum evaluation criteria. International Journal of Curriculum and Instructional Studies, 6(12), 169-186. https://ijocis.epo-der.org/arsiv-archive/

    Yeşilyurt, E., & Köroğlu, M. (2021). Eğitimde program değerlendirme: Ölçütler, yöntemler, envanterler [Program evaluation in education: Criteria, methods, inventories]. E. Yeşilyurt (Ed.), Eğitimde program geliştirme ve değerlendirme [Curriculum development and evaluation in education], (pp: 487-517). Ankara: Vizetek.

    Yeşilyurt, E. (2010). Evaluation of teaching practice curriculum in the light of standard ?based and responsive models [PhD thesis: Fırat University]. Thesis number: 263629. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/

    Yeşilyurt, E. (2021a). Eğitim programının temel kavramları [Basic concepts of the curriculum]. E. Yeşilyurt (Ed.), Eğitimde program geliştirme ve değerlendirme [Curriculum development and evaluation in education], (pp: 1-38). Ankara: Vizetek.

    Yeşilyurt, E. (2021b). Eğitimde program geliştirme ve değerlendirme [Curriculum development and evaluation in education]. Ankara: Vizetek.

    Yeşilyurt, E. (2022a). Eğitim taksonomileri [Educational taxonomies). Ankara: Vizetek.

    Yeşilyurt, E. (2022b). Eğitim taksonomisi: Temel kavramlar ve tarihsel süreç [Educational taxonomy: Basic concepts and historical process]. E. Yeşilyurt (Ed.), Eğitim taksonomileri [Educational taxonomies], (pp. 1-29). Ankara: Vizetek.

    YÖKAK (2020). 2019 yılı akreditasyon kuruluşları genel değerlendirme raporu [2019 Accreditation Organizations General Evaluation Report], https://yokak.gov.tr

    Yüksel, İ. (2010). Development of Turkish program evaluation standards [PhD thesis: Anadolu University]. Thesis number: 262343. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/

    Yüksel, S., & Sağlam, M. (2012). Eğitim programları ve öğretim ilkeleri [Curriculums and teaching principles]. Ankara: Pegem.