Araştırma Makalesi | Açık Erişim
Anadolu Türk Eğitim Dergisi 2025, Clt. 7(2) 381-393
ss. 381 - 393
Yayın Tarihi: Aralık 31, 2025 | Görüntüleme Sayısı: 0/0 | İndirilme Sayısı: 0/0
Özet
The aim of this study is to examine the effect of the technology-enhanced flipped classroom (TEFC) model, applied to the experimental group, on the academic achievement of 7th-grade students in the "Zoology" unit of the biology course, compared to the traditional teaching method used in the control group. The research was designed using a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest control group model, which is a type of experimental design. The study group consists of 51 students attending the 7th grade at a state school in Azerbaijan during the 2023-2024 academic year. In the study, the TEFC model was implemented in the experimental group, while the traditional teaching model was used in the control group. The experimental procedure lasted for a total of 8 weeks. As a data collection tool, the Zoology Achievement Test (ZAT) was administered to both groups as a pretest and posttest. For data analysis, the Mann-Whitney U test and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test were employed. According to the findings of the study, there was no statistically significant difference between the pretest scores of the experimental and control groups. However, a significant difference in favor of the experimental group was found in the posttest ZAT scores between the experimental group (which received the TEFC model) and the control group (which received the traditional model). Furthermore, in both the experimental and control groups, posttest scores significantly increased compared to pretest scores. These results suggest that the flipped classroom model is more effective than traditional methods in enhancing academic achievement in 7th-grade biology lessons on zoology topics. In this context, it is recommended that future researchers include variables such as motivation, higher-order thinking skills, and affective outcomes in their studies. Additionally, teachers are encouraged to use the flipped classroom model effectively in their classrooms.
Anahtar kelimeler: Science education, biology teaching, academic achievement, zoology
APA 7th edition
Aliyev, B., & Adiguzel, A. (2025). The Effect of Flipped Classroom Model on Student Achievement in Biology Lessons. Anadolu Türk Eğitim Dergisi, 7(2), 381-393.
Harvard
Aliyev, B. and Adiguzel, A. (2025). The Effect of Flipped Classroom Model on Student Achievement in Biology Lessons. Anadolu Türk Eğitim Dergisi, 7(2), pp. 381-393.
Chicago 16th edition
Aliyev, Baylar and Abdullah Adiguzel (2025). "The Effect of Flipped Classroom Model on Student Achievement in Biology Lessons". Anadolu Türk Eğitim Dergisi 7 (2):381-393.
Adonu, C. J., Nwagbo, C. R., Ugwuanyi, C. S., & Okeke, I. O. (2021). Improving students’ achievement and retention in biology using flipped classroom and PowerPoint instructional approaches: Implication for physics teaching. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 25(2), 234–247.
Arslanhan, A., Bakırcı, H., & Altunova, N. (2022). Science teachers’ views on the flipped teaching model. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 10(19), 26–49. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1017574
Ceylan, E., & Hamzaoğlu, E. (2022). A review of postgraduate theses using flipped learning approach in science education fields in Turkey. Journal of Anatolian Cultural Research, 6(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.15659/ankad.v6i1.195
Chebotib, N., Too, J., & Ongeti, K. (2022). Effects of the flipped learning approach on students’ academic achievement in secondary schools in Kenya. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 12(6), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-1206030110
Çakır, E., & Yaman, S. (2017). The effect of flipped classroom practices on students’ science achievement and mental risk-taking skills in science lessons. Journal of Science Teaching, 5(2), 130–142.
Demirel, O. E., & Türkmen, L. (2025). Common knowledge construction model applications: Investigating the effects on academic achievement and retention. Kastamonu Education Journal, 33(3), 585–601. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.1750183
Divine, G., Norton, H. J., Hunt, R., & Dienemann, J. (2013). A review of analysis and sample size calculation considerations for Wilcoxon tests. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 117(3), 699–710. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e31827f53d7
Dorji, S., & Dorji, K. (2022). Flipped classroom in teaching biology: Assessing students’ academic achievement in Tang Central School, Bumthang District. Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied and Basic Subjects, 2(2), 1–8. https://identifier.visnav.in/1.0002/ijabs-22a-10002
Ebrahim, A. H., & Naji, S. A. B. (2021). The influence of flipped learning methods on high school learners’ biology attainment and social intelligence in Kuwait. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(8), Article em1987.
Karagöz, Y. (2010). The power and effectiveness of nonparametric techniques. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 9(33), 18–40.
Karasar, N. (2009). Scientific research method: Concepts, principles, techniques. Nobel Publishing.
Kozikoğlu, İ., & Camuşcu, K. (2019). The relationship between secondary school students’ flipped learning readiness and their attitudes towards inquiry. Education by Living, 33(2), 187–201.
Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30–43.
Liu, L., Liu, K., & Zhao, J. (2020). Development of online flipped blended teaching mode in higher vocational education during COVID-19 outbreak: A case study. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference of Educational Innovation through Technology (pp. 193–198). IEEE.
Malto, G. A. O., Dalida, C. S., & Lagunzad, C. G. B. (2018). Flipped classroom approach in teaching biology: Assessing students’ academic achievement and attitude towards biology. KnE Social Sciences, 540–554.
Koray, Ö., Çakar, V., & Koray, A. (2023). The effect of the flipped classroom model on students’ achievement, problem-solving skills, and attitudes towards physics lesson. Psycho-Educational Research Reviews, 12(1), 289–305. https://doi.org/10.52963/PERR_Biruni_V12.N1.18
Sletten, S. R. (2017). Investigating flipped learning: Student self-regulated learning, perceptions, and achievement in an introductory biology course. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26, 347–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9683-8
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2011). Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). In International encyclopedia of statistical science (pp. 902–904). Springer.
Taşkın, G., & Aksoy, G. (2019). Developing an attitude scale towards science course: Validity and reliability study. İnönü University Journal of the Institute of Educational Sciences, 6(12), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.29129/inujgse.542568
Yavuz, M. (2016). The effect of flipped classroom practices on academic achievement and examination of student experiences at secondary education level (Unpublished master’s thesis). Atatürk University, Erzurum, Türkiye.
Yavuz, M., & Karaman, S. (2021). Examination of the effect of the flipped classroom model on the academic achievement and experiences of secondary school students. Journal of the Faculty of Education of Abant İzzet Baysal University, 21(4), 1127–1144.
Yıldız, E., & Ergin, Ö. (2007). Supercognitive and science teaching. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Faculty of Education, 27(3), 175–196.
Yurtlu, S. (2018). Examination of the effect of the flipped classroom model on student achievement and opinions in science education (Unpublished master’s thesis). Muş Alparslan University, Muş, Türkiye.